Backbench: Theresa May is criminally underpraised for her phenomenal leadership 

What our Prime Minister has quietly achieved over the last two years is nothing short of astonishing.

This article was first published on Backbench.

In recent days, a major step toward completing the all-encompassing project that is Brexit has been taken for the first time in what seems like many decades. Theresa May has secured the backing of her Cabinet (well, most of it) for her final, official, it’s-the-real-thing-this-time Brexit proposal and is now busily packing her bags full of digestives and pictures of Nigel Lawson as she prepares to jet off to Brussels to present the work of her premiership to the overlords of Europe.

What our Prime Minister has quietly achieved over the past two years is nothing short of astonishing. During her first days in office, she purged the Cameron government in the most ground-shaking reshuffle in recent, or indeed distant memory, installing in its place a perfect cocktail of Brexiteers and Remainers.

Since then, she has weathered at least five high-profile cabinet resignations, not to mention a national and international press extraordinarily unanimous in its portrayal of a government in disarray, bewildered by the complexities of Brexit and hopelessly pushed around by the big boys of Europe, without so much as flinching.

In the face of this unprecedented united front against her, she could have been forgiven for crying out in desperation and leaping onto the Trumpian wagon of screaming ‘fake news’ every time something doesn’t go entirely to plan. Rather, she opted to continue working away quietly on her ingenious strategy for executing the most complex manoeuvre in British political history.

The long list of onerous calls Theresa May has had to make in her time as Prime Minister appears endless and she has got it right practically every time, even under extreme pressure. Her adept deal-making to form a government in the aftermath of the general election and her flawless management of her government to seemingly always get her way on the things that matter display a political aptitude unseen since Thatcher. The only poor call she has made concerned the election itself and, as we know, that one was largely made by others.

Regarding Brexit, without batting an eyelid as the world has watched and scorned her continually and groundlessly, she has calmly done what needed to be done. Recently, she has expertly faced down parliamentary rebellions led by Dominic Grieve during the passage of the EU Withdrawal Bill and, of course, struggled to keep together an incredibly volatile Cabinet that continues to pull itself in entirely different directions to the point of self-destruction.

The way she did those things is almost indiscernible and essentially indescribable in its brilliance. From the outside, coming up with any kind of hypothetically functional Brexit deal seemed like an impossible task, let alone winning Cabinet support for it. The same goes for the spectacular astuteness displayed in her dogged defeat of Tory rebels and persistent Lords opposition to the sovereignty of government.

This is all in addition to her countless other forgotten victories, such as surviving the attempted coup by former party chairman Grant Shapps without suffering so much as a scratch in October of last year, as well as her masterly handling of the Windrush scandal and the allegations of widespread sexual misconduct in Westminster at the height of the #MeToo movement. In all these cases and countless others, May has exhibited an unparalleled leadership ability.

Looking forward, she has altered the Brexit universe in a way everyone thought impossible. She has reasserted her position of authority in public as well as in private and veritably reintroduced the threat of a No Deal Brexit. Following the Chequers summit, her freshly subdued minion Michael Gove toddled off to the BBC to reinstate ‘no deal is better than a bad deal’ as the official mantra of this government as it heads into the hardest and most salient part of the Brexit process.

The threat of turning over the tables Christ-style by pulling out of the negotiations and leaving the EU with no divorce bill and no trade deal is indispensable in ensuring Britain’s strong negotiating position in order to avoid subjugation at the hands of the Euro crew. Two years ago, said negotiating position appeared as strong as could reasonably be expected.

It is only because of the aforementioned united anti-May media front that the substance of the threat of No Deal has gradually disintegrated along with any hope of avoiding the Euro-bullying decried by that very same press; the PM watched on as public confidence in her government’s delivery of Brexit put a pistol in its mouth and pulled the trigger. That is, until this week, when her ruthless politics put the possibility of No Deal very much back on the table and thereby shored up Britain’s position at the crucial juncture.

It took nothing less than perfectly timed, perfectly judged political brutality from this astonishingly talented Prime Minister to prevent Brexit from deteriorating into the shambles that it could so easily have become. She will, of course, continue to not only be criminally underpraised but also viciously and unjustly attacked from all sides for even the most negligible misdemeanour in the coming months as she utilises her astounding political shrewdness to either obtain the best feasible Brexit deal or confidently walk away from the EU altogether. With or without David Davis and Boris Johnson.

If European leaders are not quaking in their boots right now, then they are even more incompetent than us.

DriveTribe: What Tesla’s Chinese Gigafactory tells us about the future

Tesla, in the grand scheme of things, is very young at just fifteen years old but has erupted onto centre-stage of the motoring revolution.

This article was first published on DriveTribe.

In his 1978 work ‘The Fate of Empires and the Search for Survival’, British historian and philosopher Sir John Bagot Glubb documented what he called the ‘life cycle of the empire’. Having studied dozens of historical empires, Glubb concluded that each passed through the same seven stages as it grew and flourished before slowing and plateauing and finally shrinking and imploding.

He argued that each empire begins with an age of outburst and pioneers, before progressing onto an age of conquests, then commerce, followed by affluence, then intellect, before decadence, and finally decline and collapse. Glubb contested that empires of all forms, regardless of their historical context, conformed to this basic structure over generations and eventually succumbed to the same fate.

Elon Musk is an emperor. He began as a student armed with an almighty entrepreneurial spirit and ventured fearlessly into the big wide world of business. Having made his fortune in finance and computing, he founded SpaceX and Tesla as he positioned himself very definitively as the leading face of the technological revolution, arms spread wide at the stern of the ship like Kate Winslet.

Musk’s Tesla empire is the one of concern to those of an automotive persuasion. The company, in the grand scheme of things, is very young at just fifteen years old but has erupted onto centre-stage of the motoring revolution. It was the first carmaker to truly launch itself into electric vehicle innovation, and it continues to lead the way in terms of autonomous technology.

Tesla has now passed the first stage of its empire life cycle, namely the age of outburst and pioneers, and has passed into the age of conquest. Certainly in terms of electric vehicles, it has the technology and the designs and even the orders and is now in the process of making them a reality. It is transitioning from some exciting drawings in a rented office to a real, functioning automotive giant that leads the entire market.

As with everything, Musk does not take the concept of conquest lightly, the latest manifestation of which can be found in the news of Tesla’s booming march into China. It was revealed this week that an agreement has been signed between Elon and Chinese authorities to build a factory in the city of Shanghai, home to more people than Belgium and Tunisia put together.

Of course, this is Tesla; inevitably, this will be no ordinary factory. Musk professes that it shall be the first ever Tesla Gigafactory outside of the US, having already set a target of churning out half a million vehicles within five years of being built. In a statement, Musk described the as yet non-existent facility as ‘a state-of-the-art vehicle factory and a role model for sustainability’.

This age of conquest is an astounding one to witness. In this stage, the emperor sees the potential of his mighty forces and swoons over enormous maps as he fantasises about the vast swathes of land over which he could rule. Once this part of the cycle is complete and Tesla has expanded as far as its waistline will stretch, it will progress into being a staggeringly efficient economic machine, using commerce to rake in wealth.

The collation of this wealth will allow for the commencement of the ages of affluence and decadence, in which it will spend much time pacing and being wise as it contemplates the enigmas of existence whilst living off the aforementioned affluence. Those stages are often quickly subsumed by that of decadence, which will see Elon finally take his eye off the ball and slip into procrastination and a sense of universal futility, thereby inviting a perhaps inevitable doom.

We ought, therefore, to enjoy Tesla as it resides among us in all its glory. Relish the marvel of its commercial and technological conquest and reap the wondrous motoring fruit it bears.